Public court records · Regulatory sources · Independently maintained Data as of: 2026-10-03 · Not legal advice

Dupixent CTCL Lawsuits

US MDL Consolidated Last verified 2026-10-03

MDL 3180 · D.N.J.

Patients diagnosed with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after using Dupixent (dupilumab) have filed products-liability lawsuits alleging the biologic drug increased their cancer risk (per firm pages, 2026)..

Overview

Patients diagnosed with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after using Dupixent (dupilumab) have filed products-liability lawsuits alleging the biologic drug increased their cancer risk (per firm pages, 2026). The cases were centralized in June 2026 as MDL 3180 in the District of New Jersey before Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, with the first lawsuit filed in February 2026 (per LawHum and MDL Radar). Sanofi and Regeneron, the drug’s manufacturers, face the claims; as of September 2026 the MDL is active with no settlement announced (per AboutLawsuits and firm pages).

Status of the science / claims: Plaintiffs allege Dupixent may increase the risk of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL); defendants dispute causation (per firm pages and court filings, 2026).

Companies involved

Settlement amounts

No settlement announced as of Sep 2026 (per firm pages). Nothing can be promised.

Figures above are as reported by the cited sources — not a promise of any individual outcome.

Last updated: 2026-09-01

Full breakdown: settlement amounts page →

Case count

45 cases as of October 1, 2026
MonthFiled casesΔ
Oct 1, 202645—

Key dates

  1. September 1, 2026Plaintiffs’ counsel propose leadership positions in the MDL; litigation active, no settlement announced (per AboutLawsuits and firm pages, Sep 2026)
  2. June 4, 2026JPML centralizes the cases into MDL 3180, D.N.J., before Judge Zahid N. Quraishi (per LawHum and MDL Radar)
  3. February 13, 2026First Dupixent CTCL lawsuit filed (per LawHum case file)

Updates

  • Updated Oct 3, 2026New case (Oct 2026, US): Dupixent (dupilumab) CTCL lawsuits — MDL 3180, D.N.J., Judge Quraishi; centralized Jun 4, 2026 (per LawHum/MDL Radar); active, no settlement (per firm pages, Sep 2026).

Last updated: today

Full changelog →

Notable filings

No notable filings recorded yet. Docket entries are added from public court records as they appear.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about this case record, answered from the public record.

Is there a Dupixent cancer lawsuit?

Yes. Patients diagnosed with CTCL after using Dupixent are litigating in MDL 3180, D.N.J., alleging the drug increased their risk (per LawHum and firm pages, 2026).

What is MDL 3180?

The In re Dupixent (Dupilumab) Products Liability Litigation, centralized by the JPML on June 4, 2026, before Judge Zahid N. Quraishi in New Jersey (per LawHum and MDL Radar).

Is there a Dupixent settlement?

No settlement has been announced as of September 2026 (per firm pages).

Can I file a claim?

Plaintiff firms are reviewing Dupixent CTCL claims (per firm pages, 2026). A case review would confirm eligibility; nothing can be promised.

Think this matters to you?

This page is neutral reference material — not legal advice. If you were affected, the next step is a free case review with a licensed attorney working this matter.

Start free case review →

By continuing you agree to our privacy policy. Your contact details are shared only with law firms working this matter, on request.