Public court records · Regulatory sources · Independently maintained Data as of: 2026-09-29 · Not legal advice

Kia Hyundai Vehicle Theft (MDL 3052) Lawsuit

KR settlement Last verified 2026-07-24

MDL 3052 · C.D. Cal.

Kia Hyundai vehicle theft lawsuits — MDL 3052, In re Kia Hyundai Vehicle Theft Litigation, C.D..

Overview

Kia Hyundai vehicle theft lawsuits — MDL 3052, In re Kia Hyundai Vehicle Theft Litigation, C.D. Cal., Judge James V. Selna (per JPML). Claimants allege that Hyundai and Kia sold 2011–2022 vehicles without engine immobilizers, making them easy to steal in a social-media-fueled “Kia Boyz” wave of thefts (per complaints and reporting). A combined settlement provides free security updates for class members and claim payments from $375 (theft attempt) up to $4,500 (total loss) for qualifying thefts, plus a $9 million multistate component (per settlement sites, 2026). An objector asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the settlement; a decision on review is expected in October 2026 (per Hagens Berman, Jul 2026).

Status of the science / claims: The claim is that 2011–2022 Hyundai and Kia vehicles lacked engine immobilizers — a standard anti-theft feature — leaving them vulnerable to theft demonstrated on social media (per court records and reporting).

Key people

Companies involved

Settlement amounts

Combined settlement: free security upgrades; claim amounts of $375 for a theft attempt, $2,250 for a partial loss and up to $4,500 for a total loss (per settlement sites, 2026); plus a $9 million multistate settlement. SCOTUS review of an objection pending, decision expected October 2026 (per Hagens Berman). No amount can be promised.

Figures above are as reported by the cited sources — not a promise of any individual outcome.

Last updated: 2026-07-24

Full breakdown: settlement amounts page →

Key dates

  1. July 7, 2026Objector’s request for Supreme Court review pending; decision expected October 2026 (per Hagens Berman)
  2. May 1, 2024Combined settlement reached: free security upgrades, claim amounts up to $4,500 (per settlement sites)
  3. May 18, 2023JPML consolidates theft cases into MDL 3052, C.D. Cal., Judge James V. Selna (per JPML)
  4. January 1, 2022“Kia Boyz” theft trend spreads via social media, driving theft claims (per reporting)

Updates

  • Updated Jul 24, 2026New case (Sep 2026): MDL 3052 — Hyundai/Kia theft settlement open (claims up to $4,500 + free upgrades); SCOTUS review decision expected Oct 2026 (per Hagens Berman).

Last updated: Jul 24, 2026

Full changelog →

Notable filings

No notable filings recorded yet. Docket entries are added from public court records as they appear.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about this case record, answered from the public record.

Is the Kia Hyundai theft settlement paying?

Yes — claims opened in 2026. Eligible owners can claim $375 for a theft attempt, $2,250 for a partial loss and up to $4,500 for a total loss, plus free security upgrades (per settlement sites).

Why was there a class action?

Plaintiffs alleged 2011–2022 Hyundai and Kia vehicles lacked engine immobilizers standard in most other U.S. vehicles, leaving them vulnerable to a social-media-fueled theft wave (per court records and reporting).

What is the status as of 2026?

The settlement is distributing; an objector’s request for Supreme Court review was pending as of July 2026, with a decision on review expected in October 2026 (per Hagens Berman).

Think this matters to you?

This page is neutral reference material — not legal advice. If you were affected, the next step is a free case review with a licensed attorney working this matter.

Start free case review →

By continuing you agree to our privacy policy. Your contact details are shared only with law firms working this matter, on request.