Overview
Patients implanted with spinal cord stimulators (SCS) have filed products-liability lawsuits alleging device malfunctions such as migration, lead fracture and inadequate warnings (per firm pages, 2026). On June 5, 2026 the JPML centralized the Boston Scientific cases as MDL 3181 in the Central District of California before Judge Josephine L. Staton (per Mass Tort America). Claims involving other manufacturers — including Abbott, Medtronic and Nevro — proceed in separate litigation (per Mass Tort America, 2026). The MDL is new and in early coordination.
Status of the science / claims: Plaintiffs allege device malfunctions (migration, fracture, lead failure) and inadequate warnings; defendants dispute defect and causation (per firm pages, 2026).
Companies involved
Settlement amounts
Early-stage MDL; no settlement announced (per Mass Tort America, 2026). Nothing can be promised.
Key dates
- October 1, 2026Claims against Abbott, Medtronic and Nevro proceed in separate litigation outside the MDL (per Mass Tort America, 2026)
- June 5, 2026JPML creates MDL 3181 in the Central District of California for Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator claims (per Mass Tort America, Jun 2026)
Updates
- Updated Oct 3, 2026New case (Oct 2026, US): Spinal cord stimulator MDL 3181 (C.D. Cal., Judge Staton) created Jun 5, 2026 for Boston Scientific claims (per Mass Tort America); Abbott/Medtronic/Nevro claims separate (per Mass Tort America).
Notable filings
No notable filings recorded yet. Docket entries are added from public court records as they appear.
FAQ
Is there a spinal cord stimulator MDL?
Yes. MDL 3181 was created on June 5, 2026 in the Central District of California for Boston Scientific SCS claims, before Judge Josephine L. Staton (per Mass Tort America).
Which companies are covered?
The MDL covers Boston Scientific devices. Claims against Abbott, Medtronic and Nevro proceed in separate litigation (per Mass Tort America, 2026).
What injuries are claimed?
Plaintiffs allege device malfunctions such as lead migration or fracture, and inadequate warnings (per firm pages, 2026). A case review would confirm eligibility; nothing can be promised.
Think this matters to you?
This page is neutral reference material — not legal advice. If you were affected, the next step is a free case review with a licensed attorney working this matter.
Start free case review →